Username: Blitzem
Please provide your name & discord name: IC Jameer Marquette | allboutmygwuap
Have you ever been staff in a serious server? Yes.
Lake City
Hyde Park Chicago
All staff are required to be apart of a department. Please provide a department that you wish to be apart of upcoming joining the team. I would be available in working in the medical field
Please provide a example of a proper /me & /do. /me proceeds to break down nugs of weed onto Backwood, rolling the leaf in a back-forth motion licking it sealed tight with lips.
/do Would be seen visibly high with bloodshot red eyes.
Please list your time zone and your availability. CST. Will be available during the night and day. my schedule is pretty flexible.
Do you have any forums experience? Yes
Explain how to move a forums thread. To go about moving a forum thread I would locate where the forum would need to be moved to, then press on the top right corning placing the forum in the correct section it needs to be placed in.
A new player joins with a realistic-looking name, but it’s clearly meant to mock a real-world tragedy or group. They claim it’s “just dark humor.” As staff, how do you handle this and why? I would then handle it professionally as quickly as possible due to the fact that in some cases, it could affect TOS terms. I would then proceed to pull the player to the side explaining him/her how it is offensive to the server rules possibly to some players too, then Cking/ Name Change the Character after some explanation on how what he did was wrong.
During a robbery scene, a player messages another outside the game to warn them what’s about to happen. The scene continues normally. As staff reviewing the report, what concerns you most and how do you handle it? As a staff member, my biggest concern would be on the person going OOC giving information to his peers KNOWING it will be unfair. I would then be getting the Clip on the player who apparently messaged the other player OOC. If his clip then proves that he did go OOC then it would be an immediate ban due to the fact he metagamed during an Active Robbery, even if the scene still played out to be valid.
A player walks away from an active RP situation without saying anything and later claims, “My character wouldn’t care.” How do you judge whether this was valid character choice or roleplay avoidance? It depends on the situation, if the player knew something intense was about to play on like getting robbed, shot, Police, then it would be considered roleplay avoidance. With no realistic reaction or attempt to continue interaction, that usually looks more like roleplay avoidance than actual character development. Especially if leaving the scene gives them an advantage or avoids consequences.
You notice a rule issue developing within a scene. How would you go about what your seeing in the scene? If i noticed a rule being broken miod scene, was always taught to play it out and send it up last, still staying in character handling everything professionally If it becomes clear that a rule is about to be broken like obvious metagaming, powergaming, RDM, or OOC toxicity, I’d intervene calmly and professionally .Afterward, I’d review logs, clips, and both sides of the story before deciding on any punishment. My priority would be keeping the RP fair, maintaining immersion for everyone involved.
A player repeatedly uses mechanics to gain advantages but technically follows the scripts correctly. How do you decide whether this is clever gameplay or abuse that hurts roleplay? Its doesn't matter if he follows the script correctly, using anything to an advantage in Fivem is considered powergaming.In these cases, I’d address it as rule abuse or fail RP even if there isn’t a script technically being broken, because staff should enforce both the rules and the overall quality/fairness of roleplay.
Two players give completely different versions of a scene. Both seem confident and neither has video. How do you investigate and make a fair decision as staff? If neither have a clip on what happened and nobody else was around scene would then be considered invalid until proven guilty. giving the staff the time to go about checking logs depending on what exactly happened. If there still isn’t enough evidence to clearly prove a rule break, I would avoid harsh punishment based only on accusations. Staff decisions should be based on evedince not assumptions.
You notice the same player appears in multiple reports—not always guilty, but always involved in messy situations. At what point does this become a concern, and how should staff address it? It comes to a concern when the player is always getting involved in the same issues, even if they are not always fully guilty. At that point, staff should look at the overall pattern, not just individual reports. I’d speak with the player, explain the repeated issues, and set expectations moving forward.
A player takes a huge risk in a dangerous situation and loses their character as a result. They complain that it was unfair. How do you explain consequences while still being respectful and professional? As a staff member I would go about handling this professionally by stating that actions in roleplay have consequences, especially in high-risk situations. If the outcome followed server rules and happened through fair RP At the same time, I’d stay respectful and acknowledge that losing a character can be frustrating, especially if the player was attached to them
A civilian resists police in a situation that realistically would not justify extreme actions. How do you judge whether the player acted realistically or just wanted an outcome? If a player turns a minor stop or simple interaction into extreme resistance with no believable reason, it can look more like they wanted a chase or shootout outcome rather than realistic RP. I’d consider the character’s background, the severity of the situation, and whether their actions added believable roleplay or just forced escalation.
A player roleplays severe injuries during a scene but is completely fine an hour later with no explanation. How should staff handle situations like this to maintain consistency? first, I’d review the context to see how severe the injuries actually were and whether the player ignored realistic consequences. If needed, I’d remind them that injuries should have lasting effects appropriate to the situation and shouldn’t only matter during the active scene.
You make a ruling that a player strongly disagrees with, but it’s fair and consistent. They continue arguing. How do you handle this while maintaining authority and professionalism? To go about handling this professionally I’d clearly explain the reasoning behind the decision, reference the relevant rules or server standards, and make sure the player feels heard even if the ruling stands. If they continue arguing after the decision has been fully explained, I’d politely end the discussion and let them know the ruling is final.
Some one in the discord makes a ticket regarding applications, how would you respond to their ticket? Tell them we’ve received their application ticket and will review it as soon as possible
Please provide your name & discord name: IC Jameer Marquette | allboutmygwuap
Have you ever been staff in a serious server? Yes.
Lake City
Hyde Park Chicago
All staff are required to be apart of a department. Please provide a department that you wish to be apart of upcoming joining the team. I would be available in working in the medical field
Please provide a example of a proper /me & /do. /me proceeds to break down nugs of weed onto Backwood, rolling the leaf in a back-forth motion licking it sealed tight with lips.
/do Would be seen visibly high with bloodshot red eyes.
Please list your time zone and your availability. CST. Will be available during the night and day. my schedule is pretty flexible.
Do you have any forums experience? Yes
Explain how to move a forums thread. To go about moving a forum thread I would locate where the forum would need to be moved to, then press on the top right corning placing the forum in the correct section it needs to be placed in.
A new player joins with a realistic-looking name, but it’s clearly meant to mock a real-world tragedy or group. They claim it’s “just dark humor.” As staff, how do you handle this and why? I would then handle it professionally as quickly as possible due to the fact that in some cases, it could affect TOS terms. I would then proceed to pull the player to the side explaining him/her how it is offensive to the server rules possibly to some players too, then Cking/ Name Change the Character after some explanation on how what he did was wrong.
During a robbery scene, a player messages another outside the game to warn them what’s about to happen. The scene continues normally. As staff reviewing the report, what concerns you most and how do you handle it? As a staff member, my biggest concern would be on the person going OOC giving information to his peers KNOWING it will be unfair. I would then be getting the Clip on the player who apparently messaged the other player OOC. If his clip then proves that he did go OOC then it would be an immediate ban due to the fact he metagamed during an Active Robbery, even if the scene still played out to be valid.
A player walks away from an active RP situation without saying anything and later claims, “My character wouldn’t care.” How do you judge whether this was valid character choice or roleplay avoidance? It depends on the situation, if the player knew something intense was about to play on like getting robbed, shot, Police, then it would be considered roleplay avoidance. With no realistic reaction or attempt to continue interaction, that usually looks more like roleplay avoidance than actual character development. Especially if leaving the scene gives them an advantage or avoids consequences.
You notice a rule issue developing within a scene. How would you go about what your seeing in the scene? If i noticed a rule being broken miod scene, was always taught to play it out and send it up last, still staying in character handling everything professionally If it becomes clear that a rule is about to be broken like obvious metagaming, powergaming, RDM, or OOC toxicity, I’d intervene calmly and professionally .Afterward, I’d review logs, clips, and both sides of the story before deciding on any punishment. My priority would be keeping the RP fair, maintaining immersion for everyone involved.
A player repeatedly uses mechanics to gain advantages but technically follows the scripts correctly. How do you decide whether this is clever gameplay or abuse that hurts roleplay? Its doesn't matter if he follows the script correctly, using anything to an advantage in Fivem is considered powergaming.In these cases, I’d address it as rule abuse or fail RP even if there isn’t a script technically being broken, because staff should enforce both the rules and the overall quality/fairness of roleplay.
Two players give completely different versions of a scene. Both seem confident and neither has video. How do you investigate and make a fair decision as staff? If neither have a clip on what happened and nobody else was around scene would then be considered invalid until proven guilty. giving the staff the time to go about checking logs depending on what exactly happened. If there still isn’t enough evidence to clearly prove a rule break, I would avoid harsh punishment based only on accusations. Staff decisions should be based on evedince not assumptions.
You notice the same player appears in multiple reports—not always guilty, but always involved in messy situations. At what point does this become a concern, and how should staff address it? It comes to a concern when the player is always getting involved in the same issues, even if they are not always fully guilty. At that point, staff should look at the overall pattern, not just individual reports. I’d speak with the player, explain the repeated issues, and set expectations moving forward.
A player takes a huge risk in a dangerous situation and loses their character as a result. They complain that it was unfair. How do you explain consequences while still being respectful and professional? As a staff member I would go about handling this professionally by stating that actions in roleplay have consequences, especially in high-risk situations. If the outcome followed server rules and happened through fair RP At the same time, I’d stay respectful and acknowledge that losing a character can be frustrating, especially if the player was attached to them
A civilian resists police in a situation that realistically would not justify extreme actions. How do you judge whether the player acted realistically or just wanted an outcome? If a player turns a minor stop or simple interaction into extreme resistance with no believable reason, it can look more like they wanted a chase or shootout outcome rather than realistic RP. I’d consider the character’s background, the severity of the situation, and whether their actions added believable roleplay or just forced escalation.
A player roleplays severe injuries during a scene but is completely fine an hour later with no explanation. How should staff handle situations like this to maintain consistency? first, I’d review the context to see how severe the injuries actually were and whether the player ignored realistic consequences. If needed, I’d remind them that injuries should have lasting effects appropriate to the situation and shouldn’t only matter during the active scene.
You make a ruling that a player strongly disagrees with, but it’s fair and consistent. They continue arguing. How do you handle this while maintaining authority and professionalism? To go about handling this professionally I’d clearly explain the reasoning behind the decision, reference the relevant rules or server standards, and make sure the player feels heard even if the ruling stands. If they continue arguing after the decision has been fully explained, I’d politely end the discussion and let them know the ruling is final.
Some one in the discord makes a ticket regarding applications, how would you respond to their ticket? Tell them we’ve received their application ticket and will review it as soon as possible